Internet-Draft rdap-geofeed July 2023
Singh & Harrison Expires 30 January 2024 [Page]
Workgroup:
Registration Protocols Extensions (regext)
Internet-Draft:
draft-jasdips-regext-rdap-geofeed-00
Published:
Intended Status:
Standards Track
Expires:
Authors:
J. Singh
ARIN
T. Harrison
APNIC

An RDAP Extension for Geofeed Data

Abstract

This document defines a new RDAP extension geofeedv1 for including a geofeed file URL in an IP Network object.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 30 January 2024.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

[RFC8805] and [I-D.ymbk-opsawg-9092-update] (obsoletes [RFC9092]) detail the IP geolocation feed (in short, geofeed) concept. This document specifies how the geofeed data can be accessed through RDAP. It defines a new RDAP extension geofeedv1 for including a geofeed file URL in an IP Network object.

1.1. Requirements Language

The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

2. Specification

2.1. Extension

A new RDAP extension geofeedv1 is defined for accessing the geofeed data through RDAP. It extends the IP Network object class [RFC9083] to include a new geofeed member.

An RDAP server conforming to this specification MUST include the geofeedv1 extension string in the rdapConformance array for the IP Network lookup and search responses, as well as in the help response.

2.2. Geofeed Member

The IP Network object class is extended to include a new geofeed member, as specified below:

geofeed — a string specifying the HTTPS URL of the geofeed file for an IP network [RFC9092]

Since this specification extends the base definition of the IP Network object class, per Section 6 of [RFC7480], the geofeed member name MUST be prefixed with the geofeedv1 extension string, followed by an underscore: geofeedv1_geofeed.

The geofeed member is OPTIONAL for the geofeedv1 extension. Furthermore, the Redaction by Removal method [I-D.ietf-regext-rdap-redacted] SHOULD be used when redacting this member.

2.3. Example

Here is an elided example of an IP Network object with the geofeedv1 extension and the geofeedv1_geofeed member:

{
  "rdapConformance" : [
    "rdap_level_0",
    "geofeedv1"
  ],
  "objectClassName" : "ip network",
  "handle" : "XXXX-RIR",
  "startAddress" : "2001:db8::",
  "endAddress" : "2001:db8:0:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff",
  "ipVersion" : "v6",
  "name": "NET-RTR-1",
  "type" : "DIRECT ALLOCATION",
  "country" : "AU",
  "parentHandle" : "YYYY-RIR",
  "status" : [ "active" ],
  …
  "geofeedv1_geofeed" : "https:example.net/geofeed"
}

3. Privacy Considerations

When including a geofeed file URL in an IP Network object, an RDAP server operator SHOULD follow the guidance from Section 7 of [I-D.ymbk-opsawg-9092-update] to not accidentally expose the location of an individual.

4. Security Considerations

[I-D.ymbk-opsawg-9092-update] requires an HTTPS URL for a geofeed file, and optionally RPKI-signing the data within. Besides that, this document does not introduce any new security considerations past those already discussed in the RDAP protocol specifications.

5. IANA Considerations

IANA is requested to register the following value in the RDAP Extensions Registry:

Extension identifier: geofeedv1

Registry operator: Any

Published specification: This document.

Contact: IETF [email protected]

Intended usage: This extension describes version 1 of a method to access the IP geolocation feed data through RDAP.

6. Normative References

[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC7480]
Newton, A., Ellacott, B., and N. Kong, "HTTP Usage in the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)", STD 95, RFC 7480, DOI 10.17487/RFC7480, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7480>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8805]
Kline, E., Duleba, K., Szamonek, Z., Moser, S., and W. Kumari, "A Format for Self-Published IP Geolocation Feeds", RFC 8805, DOI 10.17487/RFC8805, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8805>.
[RFC9083]
Hollenbeck, S. and A. Newton, "JSON Responses for the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)", STD 95, RFC 9083, DOI 10.17487/RFC9083, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9083>.
[RFC9092]
Bush, R., Candela, M., Kumari, W., and R. Housley, "Finding and Using Geofeed Data", RFC 9092, DOI 10.17487/RFC9092, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9092>.

7. Informative References

[I-D.ietf-regext-rdap-redacted]
Gould, J., Smith, D., Kolker, J., and R. Carney, "Redacted Fields in the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Response", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-regext-rdap-redacted-13, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-redacted-13>.
[I-D.ymbk-opsawg-9092-update]
Bush, R., Candela, M., Kumari, W. A., and R. Housley, "Finding and Using Geofeed Data", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ymbk-opsawg-9092-update-02, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ymbk-opsawg-9092-update-02>.

Authors' Addresses

Jasdip Singh
ARIN
Tom Harrison
APNIC